Sound, hearing and magic names in ancient neoplatonism. Part 2: gods and theurgy
2023
Volume №24
Issue 3 (часть 1)
Publication date: 04.01.2024
Section: Философия
Kurdybaylo Dmitrii Sergeevich
National Research University Higher School of Economics; Senior Research Fellow, Herzen State Pedagogical Univ.; Senior Research Fellow, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.3.3.040
Download article file
Download article metadata file
Annotation
Both Christian theologists and pagan philosophers of early Alexandrian tradition (2–4 cent. AD) took great pains to substantiate magic efficacy of names and speech. Linguistic conceptions of Plato’s Cratylus, Aristotelian De interpretatione and that of Stoics were reconsidered. One of the major difficulties of that time was the possibility for a human to communicate with gods and the intellectual realm, which hardly agrees with Platonic metaphysics. However, Neoplatonists manage to prove that incorporeal gods can produce speech and perceive sounds without any material intermediaries. Musical sounds, both artificial and natural, are symbolically related to the harmony of the intelligible realm. Similarly, among words of human languages there are particular ones of a symbolic nature that substantiate the theurgic communication with intelligible gods.
Keywords
word, sound, name, Aristotle, Proclus Lycius, Ammonius Hermiae, philosophy of language
Literature
1. Kurdybailo D. S., Kurdybailo I. P. The ontology of name and naming
in Proclus' commentary on Plato's "Cratylus" // Platonic Studies. —
2018. — № 8 (1). — Pp. 86-124 .
79
2. Petrov V. V. ΣύΜβολα and συνθήματα in the theurgic Neoplatonism of Iamblichus and Proclus // Πλατωνικὰ ζΗτήΜατα. Studies on the history of Platonism /
Under the general editorship of V. V. Petrov. Moscow: Krug, 2013. pp. 210-225.
3. Plotinus. The Second Ennead / translated by T. G. Sidasha. — St. Petersburg: Publishing House. Oleg Abyshko, 2004 .
4. Plotinus. Treatises 1-11 / ed. edited by Yu. A. Shichalin, Moscow: The Greek-Latin Cabinet of Yu.A. Shichalin, 2007.
5. Dams. The Fourth Ennead / translated by T. G. Sidasha. — St. Petersburg: Publishing House. Oleg
Abyshko, 2004 .
6. Dams. The Sixth Ennead, treatises I–V / translated by T. G. Sidasha. — St. Petersburg:
Ed. Oleg Abyshko, 2005 .
7. Procl. Platonic Theology / ed. and translated by L. Y. Lukomsky. — St. Petersburg:
Publishing house of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Etc. "Summer Garden", 2001.
8. Takho-Godi A. A. The term "symbol" in ancient Greek literature //
A. A. Takhogodi, A. F. Losev. Greek culture in myths, symbols, and terms. St. Petersburg: Alethea, 1999. pp. 329-361 .
9. Fragments of early Greek philosophers. Part 1: From epic theocosmogonies to the emergence of atomistics. / Ed. by A. V. Lebedev, Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989.
10. Chlup R. Proclus. An Introduction. — Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2012 .
11. Die Fragmente des Eudoxos von Knidos / hrsgb. Fr. Lassaerre. — (Texte und
Kommentare, 4). — Berlin: de Gruyter, 1966 .
12. Dillon J. M. The Magical Power of Names in Origen and Later Platonism //
Origeniana Tertia: The Third International Colloqium for Origen Studies / ed. by
R. Hanson and H. Crouzel. — Roma: Edizioni Dell’Ateneo, 1985. — P. 203–216 .
13. Gregoric, P. (2007) Aristotle on the Common Sense. Oxford: Oxford
University Press .
14. Iamblichus: De mysteriis / eds. E. C. Clarke, J. M. Dillon, and J. P. Hershbell.
(Writings from the Greco- Roman World 4). — Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature,
2003 .
15. Kurdybaylo D. On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of
Proclus // Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. — 2019. — Vol.
13.2. — P. 463–485 .
16. Kurdybaylo D. Proclus on Indivisible and Continuous: Aristotelian Physics
vs. Platonic Theology // Platonic Investigations. — 2022. — Vol. 17 (2). — P. 89–100 .
17. Lewi H. Chaldaean Oracles and Theurgy. Mystic Magic and Platonism in
the Later Roman Empire. — Paris: Institut d’Etudes Augustiniennes, 2011 .
18. Oracles Chaldaïques. / Éd. par É. des Places, P. Thillet et J. Trouillard. — Paris:
Les belles lettres, 1989 .
19. Origène. Contre Celse. Vol. 1 / éd. M. Borret. (Sources chrétiennes 132). —
Paris: Cerf, 1967 .
20. Plotini opera. 3 vols. / eds. P. Henry and H.-R. Schwyzer. — Leiden: Brill,
1951–1973 .
21. Porfirio. Lettera ad Anebo / ed. A. R. Sodano. — Naples: L’Arte Tipografica, 1958 .
22. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Cratylum commentaria / ed. G. Pasquali. —
Leipzig: Teubner, 1908 .
80
23. Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii, vol. 2 / ed. W. Kroll. —
Leipzig: Teubner, 1901 .
24. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum commentaria. 3 vols. / ed. E. Diehl. —
Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1965 .
25. Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Vol. 4: Book 3, Part II: Proclus on
the World Soul / ed. D. Baltzly. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 .
26. Proclus. On Plato Cratylus / tr. B. Duvick, ed. H. Tarrant. —London: Bloomsbury, 2014 .
27. Proclus. Théologie platonicienne. Vols. 1–6 / eds. H. D. Saffrey,
L. G. Westerink. — Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1968–1997 .
28. Rappe S. Reading Neoplatonism: Non-discursive thinking in the texts of
Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius. — Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press,
2007 .
29. Rorem P. Biblical and Liturgical Symbols within the Pseudo- Dionysian
Synthesis. — Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1984 .
30. Sambursky S., Pines S. The Concept of Time in Late Neoplatonism. —
Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1971 .
31. Simplicii in Aristotelis De caelo commentaria / ed. I. L. Heiberg. — Berlin:
Reimer, 1894 .
32. Struck P. T. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of their
Texts. — Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004 .
33. Trouillard J. Le symbolisme chez Proclos // Dialogues d’histoire ancienne. —
1981. — Vol. 7. — P. 297‒308.
The research was carried out with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 21-011-44078 "The Word of God and the Book of Nature in the focus
of human cognition (Interaction of Christian theology and Science at different historical stages)".