The sublime and the liberal politics: on the genealogy of liberal political and aesthetical sensuality in the social metaphysics of Kant
2023
Volume №24
Issue 3 (часть 1)
Publication date: 04.01.2024
Section: Философия
Nogovitsin Oleg Nikolaevich
The Sociological Institute of the RAS — Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.3.3.041
Download article file
Download article metadata file
Annotation
The article is dedicated to Kant’s representation of the genealogy of liberal sensuality reproduced within the framework of yielding the liberal state of mind, which we take as a leading political and aesthetical phenomenon of the world of modernism. Based on the collection of respective works of Kant (“The Critique of Judgement”, “The Conflict of the Faculties”, “Metaphysics of Morals” etc.), we analyze the aporias emerging within the transition from the principles of law to the rightful political action, the estimation of moral grounds of the possibility of such a transition, and, fore and foremost, the aesthetic context wherein it occurs. We also demonstrated the complicated relations between Kant’s description of this issue and the attempt of its solving by Hannah Arendt, whose conception determines the modern liberal approaches to the practice of revolutionary action and formulation of the principles of liberal geopolitics. In this aspect, we scrutinize the Kantian distinction of the politically engaged sensualism from the standpoint of the triple structure of sensual representation of principles of morality within the politically judging and acting subject: the superstition – the sublime – the enthusiasm.
Keywords
theory of liberalism, sublime, superstition, enthusiasm, war, law, morality, politics, moral community.
Literature
1. Arendt H. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2012.
2. Isakov A.N., Sukhachev V.Yu. The ethos of consciousness. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 1999.
3. Kant I. Religion within reason alone // Kant I. Collected works in 8 volumes — vol. 6. — M.: Choro, 1994. — pp. 5-222.
4. Kant I. Dispute of faculties // Kant I. Collected works in 8 volumes — Vol. 7. — M.: Choro, 1994. — pp. 5-136.
5. Kant I. Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view // Kant I. Collected Works in 8 volumes — vol. 7. — M.: Choro, 1994. — pp. 137-376.
6. Kant I. Criticism of the ability of judgment // Kant I. Writings in German and Russian. — Vol. 4. — M.: Nauka, 2001.
7. Kant I. Metaphysics of morals. The first part. Metaphysical principles of the doctrine of law // Kant I. Works in German and Russian. — Vol. 5. Part 1. — Moscow: Nauka, 2014.
8. Nogovitsin O.N. Kant's justification of liberalism as a social theory: war, law, morality // Filozofijai društvo / Philosophy and Society. — 2022. — Vol. 33 No. 4. — P. 715-748.
9. Robespierre Maximilian. Selected works in 3 volumes — vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1965.
10. Saint-Just Louis Antoine. Speeches. Treatises. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 1995.
11. Starobinsky J. 1789: the emblematics of reason // Starobinsky Jean. Poetry and knowledge: the history of literature and culture. Vol. 2. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2002. pp. 357-500.
12. Habermas Yu. Structural change in the public sphere. Research on the category of bourgeois society. With a preface to the 1990 reissue. Moscow: The Whole World, 2016.
13. Shaftesbury. A letter of enthusiasm // Shaftesbury. Aesthetic experiments. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1975. pp. 237-271.
14. Hume David. On superstition and frenzy // Hume David. Essays in 2 volumes — vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1996, pp. 518-523.
15. Yampolsky M. Physiology of the symbolic. Book 1: The Return of Leviathan. Political theology, the representation of power and the End of the Old Regime. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2004.
16. Arendt H. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy / edited by R. Beiner. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
17. Habermas J. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. — Neuwied; Berlin: Hermann Luchterhand, 1962.