Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2023, Volume 24, Issue 3 (часть 1)
Christological dispute in the form of a platonic dialogue: some notes on the treatise Contra Aphthartodocetas by Leontios of Byzantium

Christological dispute in the form of a platonic dialogue: some notes on the treatise Contra Aphthartodocetas by Leontios of Byzantium

2023
Volume №24
Issue 3 (часть 1)
Publication date: 04.01.2024
Section: Теология
Chernoglazov Dmitrii Aleksandrovich
Saint Petersburg State University
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.3.3.050
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

Leontios of Byzantium is an outstanding Byzantine theologian of the 6th century. Studied substantially from the standpoint of theology, Leontios’ writings were not analyzed from the point of view of their language and literary form. The subject of this research is Leontios’ treatise “Contra Aphthartodocetas”, the main part of which is a dialogue between the author and his opponent. The article discusses the literary form of this dialogue. It is demonstrated that the features of the Platonic tradition are clearly manifested in it. The similarity with the Platonic dialogue is reflected in three aspects. Firstly, Leontios uses the Socratic dialectical method. Secondly, he conducts a conversation in an ironic tone characteristic of Socrates, pretending to belittle himself and exaggeratedly praise his opponent. Thirdly, in the dialogue one can find lexical parallels with Plato’s dialogues. It is concluded that Leontios’ dialogue should be considered in the context of other platonizing dialogues, written in the early Byzantine era.

Keywords

Leontios of Byzantium, Contra Aphthartodocetas, Aphthartodocetism, Platonic dialogue, dialectical method, irony.

Literature

1. Cassidy F.H. Socrates. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 2001.
2. Leontius of Byzantium. A dialogue against those of our people who joined the pernicious teachings of the Aftartodoketes / translated from Greek. Timur Shchukin, comment. Oleg Nogovitsin and Timur Shchukin // ESSE. Philosophical and theological studies. – 2021. – Vol. 6, No. 1/2. – pp. 209-237.
3. Shchukin T.A. The treatise of Leontius of Byzantium "Against the Atheists": reconstruction of the opponents' teaching // ESSE. Philosophical and theological studies. – 2021. – Vol. 6, No. 1/2. – pp. 191-208.
4. Shchukin T.A., Benevich G.I. Leontius of Byzantium / Orthodox Encyclopedia. – 2020. – Vol. 40. – pp. 534-545.
5. Theophanis chronographia / ed. C. de Boor. – T. 1. – Leipzig: Teubner, 1883.
6. Dialogues and debates from late antiquity to late Byzantium / ed. A. Cameron, N. Gaul. – London; New York, Routledge, 2017.
7. Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos / ed. P.B. Kotter. – T. 1. – Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969. P. 47-95, 101-142.
8. Enea di Gaza. Teofrasto / ed. M.E. Colonna. – Napoli: Iodice, 1958.
9. Georgii monachi chronicon / ed. C. de Boor. – Leipzig: Teubner, 1904
10. Hunger H. Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner. – Bd.1. – München: Beck, 1978.
11. Le “De Autexusio” de Méthode d’Olympe: version slave et texte grec édités et traduits en français / ed. A. Vaillant. – Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1930.
12. Leontius of Byzantium: Complete Works / ed. B.E. Daley. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
13. Ljubarskij Ja. N. The Byzantine Irony: The Case of Michael Psellos // Byzantium: State and Society: In Memory of N. Oikonomides / ed. A. Abramea, A. E. Laiou, E. K. Chrysos. – Athens, 2003. – P. 349–360.
14. Méthode d’Olympe. Le banquet / edd. H. Musurillo, V.-H.Debidour. – Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1963.
15. Perrone L. Il «Dialogo contro gli aftartodoceti» di Leonzio di Bisanzio e Severo di Antiochia // Cristianesimo nella storia. – Bologna, 1980. – Vol. 1. – P. 411–443.
16. Trizio M. Socrates in Byzantium / ed. C. Moore. The Brill Reception of Socrates. – Brill, 2019.
17. Zacaria Scolastico. Ammonio. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione, commentario / ed. M.E. Colonna. – Napoli, 1973.

The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research within the framework of the scientific project No. 21-011-44263 "Formation of the concept of "theology" as a science and its conceptual apparatus in Byzantine Christian theological thought of the late 5th — early 8th centuries in the context of scientific and philosophical knowledge of late Antiquity"
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия