Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2023, Volume 24, Issue 1
The way of logical reasoning in Aristotle’s ethical writings

The way of logical reasoning in Aristotle’s ethical writings

2023
Volume №24
Issue 1
Section: Философия
Karavaeva Svetlana Viktorovna
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.1.1.006
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

The paper examines the significance of logical arguments in Aristotle’s ethical treatises (Eudemian Ethics and Nicomachean Ethics), in particular, the use of the logical terminology introduced in Analytics. The research method used in applied sciences has its own way of reasoning, different from that used in theoretical sciences: it proceeds from the opinion, based on which one needs to draw a conclusion of the same kind, rather than from the proof. The syllogism for this kind of reasoning presupposes both a certain general opinion (major premise) and consideration of the specific circumstances for which sensory perception is important, a particular opinion (minor premise). Focusing on the provisions of the Posterior Analytics on unmediated principles, Aristotle similarly structures his reasoning about the initial principle of ethics as the ultimate goal, which is rooted in the «ultimate particular», which cannot be known and is only observed by the mind.

Keywords

Aristotle, ethics, Nicomachean Ethics, Eudemian Ethics, Prior Analytics, Posterior Analytics.

Literature

1. Aristotle. Big Ethics / Translated by T. A. Miller // Aristotle. Soch.: In 4 volumes — vol. 4. — M.: Mysl, 1984. 2. Aristotle. Evdemova ethics / Translated by T. V. Vasilyeva, T. A. Miller, M. A. Sokolova. Moscow: Canon, 2011.
3. Aristotle. Nicomachean ethics / Translated by N. V. Braginskaya // Aristotle. Soch.: In 4 volumes — vol. 4. —M.: Mysl, 1984. 4. Huseynov A. A. Aristotle // The History of Ethical Teachings, Moscow: Academic Project, 2015.
5. Kant I. Metaphysics of morals in two parts / Translated by S. Ya. Sheinman-Topshtein and Ts. G. Arzakanyan // Kant I. Soch.: In 6 vols. —Vol. 4. Part 2. —Moscow: Mysl, 1965.
6. Chernyakova.G.The ontology of time.The life of the World of Philosophy by Aristotle, Husserl and Heidegger — St. Petersburg: Higher Religious and Philosophical School, 2001-460 p. 7. Allan D. Quasi-mathematical method in the Eudemian Ethics // Aristote et les problemes de method. — Louvain, 1961.
8. Aristotle’s Ethica Nicomachea / ed. J. Bywater. — Oxf., Clarendon Press, 1894.
9. Aristotle. Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics / ed. F. Susemihl. — Leipzig: Teubner. 1884.
10. Fiedler W. Analogie-modelle bei Aristoteles. — Amsterdam, 1978.
11. Foot P. Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. — Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2002.
12. Gigon O. Die antike Philosophie als Masstab und Realität. — Zürich; München:
Artemis,1977.
13. Gottlieb P. The Virtue of Aristotle’s Ethics. — Cambridge, New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2009.
14. Keppu A. The Aristotelian Ethics. A Study of the Relations between the Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. — Oxf., 1978.
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия