Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2023, Volume 24, Issue 2
The hideous strength of ethical naturalism: whether the arguments of C. S. Lewis are to stop Joshua Green’s trolley

The hideous strength of ethical naturalism: whether the arguments of C. S. Lewis are to stop Joshua Green’s trolley

2023
Volume №24
Issue 2
Section: Философия
Naroveckii Maksim Alekseevich
Department of Philosophy of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.2.2.005
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

The scientist neurophysiologist, philosopher, and influential proponent of modern ethical naturalism, utilitarian Joshua David Green, seeks to prove that the utilitarian way of solving moral issues is justified. Green, like many scientists and philosophers who support him, is convinced that the moral weight of a decision should be determined by comparing alternatives: a weightier alternative is morally justified. To confirm this thesis, Green turns to a thought experiment known as the trolley dilemma and performs a number of neurophysiological studies of its participants. Green believes that a naturalistic interpretation of the dilemma’s answers supports a utilitarian solution that justifies the death of one innocent person in order to save five. Despite the apparent novelty of Green, his arguments were largely anticipated and reasonably challenged by the critic of ethical naturalism and proponent of value realism Clive S. Lewis.

Keywords

morality, ethics, ethical naturalism, value, norm, nihilism, utilitarianism, Non-cognitivism, C. S. Lewis, Joshua Green.

Literature

1. Kant I. Criticism of practical reason // Collected works: in 6 volumes — vol. 4, part 1. Moscow: Mysl, 1963-1965. 544 p.
2. Lossky N. O. Value and Being. — Paris: YMCA Press, 1931. — 136 p.
3. Lewis K. S. The abominable power. The stories // Collected works in 8 vols. — Vol. 4. — Moscow: O. Alexander Me Foundation; St. Petersburg: Bible for All, 2003. — 352 p. 4. Lewis K. S. Beyond the silent planet. Perelandra, The Man is canceled, etc. // Collected works in 8 vols. —Vol. 3. — St. Petersburg: Bible for all, 2003. -416 p.
5. Lewis, K. S. The Roundabout Way or the Wanderings of a Pilgrim. Miracle. Overtaken by joy (spiritual autobiography) // Collected works in 8 vols. — Vol. 7. — Moscow: Alexander Me Foundation, 2006. — 448 p.
6. Hume D. Essays in 2 vols. —Vol. 2 / Ed.2nd —Moscow: Mysl, 1996. -735 p. 7. Yulina N. S. What is physicalism? Consciousness, reduction, science // Philosophy
science and technology. — 2006. — No. 1. — URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chto-takoe- fizikalism-soznanie-reduktsiya-nauka (accessed: 12/23/2020).
8. Charles T. C. A History of Roman Literature: From the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. — London: Charles Griffin and Company, 1877. — 564 p.
9. Foot P. R. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect // Oxford Review. — 1967. — Vol. 5. — P. 5–15.
10. Greene J. D. Moral Tribes. Emotion, Reason, and the gap between us and them. — NY: The Pegnum press, 2013. — 434 p.
11. Heir R. M The Language of Morals. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952. — 202 p.
12. Lewis C. S. The Abolition of Man (or Reflections on Education with Special Reference to the Teaching of English in Upper Forms of Schools). — NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 2001. — 123 p.
13. Lewis C. S. Miracles. — NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 2009. — 145 p.
14. Matthew S. B. Against Normative Naturalism // Australasian Journal of Philosophy. — 2012. —Vol. 90. —No. 1. — P. 111–129.
15. Meixner U. Norm, Natur und Nihilismus: Bemerkungen zur Moral philosophischen Essenz von C. S. Lewis’ Die Abschaffung des Menschen // Möllenbeck Thomas, Wald Berthold (Hrsg.): Gott — Mensch — Natur: zum Ur-Grund der Moral mit Josef Pieper und C. S. Lewis. — Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2014. — S. 129–149.
16. Mikhail J. Elements of Moral Cognition. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. — 432 p.
17. Moore G. E. Principia Ethica / Tomas Baldwin. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. — 356 p.
18. Nagel T. The View from Nowhere. — NY: Oxford University Press, 1986. — 264 p.
19. Nagel T. You Can’t Learn About Morality from Brain Scans. The Problem with Moral Psychology // The New Republic. — November 2, 2012. — URL: https://newrepublic . com/article/115279/joshua-greenes-moral-tribes-reviewed-thomas-nagel (accessed: 09/23/2022).
20. Oddie G. Value and Desires // The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory / ed. by Iwao Hirose and Jonas Olson. — NY: Oxford University Press, 2015. — P. 60–79.
21. Putnam H. W. Reason, Truth and History. — Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, 1981. — 232 p.
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия