The theory of natural revelation in Justin martyr
Annotation
Justin the Martyr is known in the history of early Christian thought as a Christian Platonist who, with mixed success, applied the Middle Platonic tradition to Christian teaching. Recent scholars tend to see Justin mainly as a theologian and biblical thinker. The article deals with Justin’s theory of «seed logos» as a development of the New Testament idea of natural revelation. The methodological basis is found in the view of Ragtak Holte, who separated the terms «Logos spermatikos» and «seeds of the Logos» in Justin’s system and revealed the relationship between the personal Logos-Christ and natural, ethical potentialities in man. This approach to the crucial concept of Justin’s teachings has not been comprehended sufficiently. Developing Holte’s view, the author reveals the historicism of Justin’s theory, focusing on man’s reflection on Divine activity in history and one’s personality in this process. Through the analysis of relevant texts and Justin’s terminology of the doctrine of Logos spermatikos, a connecting thread is revealed between the reality of the individual’s consciousness and the phenomenon of the revelation of the divine truth in the empirical world.
Keywords
natural revelation, mind, soul, Logos spermatikos, Justin Martyr, history, nature, participation, imitation, cognation.
Literature
1. Armstrong A. H. The Origins of Christian Theology. Introduction to Ancient Philosophy / transl. translated from the English by V. A. Samoilov. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House, 2006.
2. Dillon D. The Middle Platonists / transl. translated from English by E. Afonasin. — St. Petersburg: Aleteya,
2002.
3. Polentz M. Standing up. The History of the spiritual movement / translated from German by V. M. Liniakina.
St. Petersburg: Publishing project "Quadrivium", 2015.
4. Ranovich A. B. Primary sources on the history of early Christianity. Ancient
critics of Christianity. Moscow: Politizdat, 1990.
5. St. Justin the Philosopher and Martyr. Creations / transl. prot. Petra Preobrazhen-
Moscow: Palomnik, 1996.
6. Stolyarov A. A. Stoya and stoicism. Moscow, 1995.
7. Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism / trans. by John Dillon. — Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2002.
8. Bultmann R. The Question of Natural Revelation // Essays Philosophical and
Theological. — London: SCM PRESS LTD, 1941. — P. 90–118.
9. Barnard L. W. Justin Martyr, His Life and Thought. — Cambridge: Oxford University
Press, 1967.
10. Danielou J. The Lord of History. Reflections on the Inner Meaning of History. —
Chicago: Longmans, Green and Co Ltd, 1958.
11. Duncker L. Zur Geschichte der Christlichen Logoslehre in den Ersten Jahrhunderten
Die Logoslehre Justin’s des Märtyrers. — Göttingen, 1848.
12. Edwards M. J. On the Platonic Schooling of Justin Martyr // The Journal of
Theological Studies. — 1991. — Vol. 42, No. 1. — P. 24–27.
13. Gartner B. The Areopagus Speech and Natural Revelation. — Uppsala: Almquist
& Wiksells, 1955.
14. Goodenough E. R. The Theology of Justin Martyr. — Jena: Walter Biedermann, 1923.
15. Guerra A. J. Romans and the apologetic tradition. The purpose, genre and audience
of Paul’s letter. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
16. Holte R. Logos Spermatikos, Christianity and Ancient Philosophy According to
St. Justin’s Apologies // Studia Theologica — Nordic Journal of Theology. — 1958. — Vol. 12, Iss. 1. — P. 109–168.
17. Martens J. W. One God, one Law: Philo of Alexandria on the Mosaic and Greco- Roman law. — Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 2003. — P. 105–125.
18. Patrologiae cursus completus. Series graeca. Tt. 1–161 / ed. J.-P. Migne. — T. 6. — Paris, 1857.
19. Price R. M. Hellenization and Logos Doctrine in Justin Martyr // Vigiliae Christianae. — 1988. — No. 42. — P. 18–23.
20. Revelation // New Catholic Encyclopedia / 2nd edition. — Vol. 12. — The Catholic University of America. The Gale Group, Inc., 2003. — P. 187–190.
21. Stoicorum veterum fragmenta / H. A. Arnim. — Tt. I–III. — Stutgardiae in aedibus B. G. Tuebneri, 1964.
The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 21-011-44178 "The formation of rational Theology in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages", BFU named after Immanuel
Kanta