About an information subject
Publication date: 20.03.2024
Section: Философия
Lebedev Sergej Pavlovich
Тhe Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after Fyodor Dostoevsky
Surkov Aleksandr Georgievich
Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy named after F. M. Dostoevsky
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2024.1.1.003
Download article file
Download article metadata file
Annotation
The results of analyze of new kind of a philosophic subject — the information subject — are published. The subject’s activity, being percepted by an observer, can be analyzed by the observer under certain methodology and concept system based on the idea of a special science, which is thought well formalized (its idea contains as minimum its subject, the object, the subject, methodology, system of concepts), and is the same way structured. The idea of information is binding with the idea of special science. The question how it is possible. Information can be presented as a structure of special way that bind concept elements. Concepts of a special science and information are treated as compatible with their stuctable capability. The structability makes possible the partial formal identity given concept to some information. This identity makes the basement of filling with the information context the identical conceptual subject structures. This way is the main part of special information method of concept manifolds expansions for a special science that make its both formal and contain genesis, and (that is important) keep moving within its borders. A special science subject who has the capability of the method implementation, is called the information subject. The method’s usage is possible both in a general mode (theoretic), and single mode (empiric). It uses the dialectic method for categories form-contain, identity-difference. The work is made under kantian rationalism context.
Keywords
information, information subject, special science, synthesis, structuralism, Kant.
Literature
1. Kagan M. (2002). Filosofiia kul’tury [The Philosophy of Culture]. — St. Petersburg: Petropolis Publ. — T. 3. — S. 241–571. — (In Russian)
2. Kant I. (1999). Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of pure reason]. — Мoscow: Nauka Publ, 1999. — 655 s. — (In Russian)
3. Kant I. (1965). Kritika prakticheskogo razuma [Critique of practical reason] // Kant I. Sobr Op. in 6 vol. — Moscow: Mysl’ Publ, 1965. — T. 4, p. 1. — S. 311–505. — (In Russian) 4. Korogodin V. I. (2012). Fenomen zhizni [The life phenomenon]. — Moscow: Nauka
Publ., 2012. — T. 2. — (In Russian)
5. Mamardashvili M. K. (2011) Formy I soderzhanie myshlenia [Forms and Contents
of Thinking]. — Moscow: Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2011. — 283 s. — (In Russian)
6. Surkov A. G. O prirode informatsii ii informatsionnyh protsessov [About nature of information and information processes]. In: RHGA Vestnik. — 2023. — No 1 (24). — S. 57–65. —
(In Russian)
7. Surkov A. G. Filosofsko-antropologicheskii vzgliad na informatsiiu I informatsionnie
protsessy [Philosophic-anthropological review on information and information processes]. In: Moderniti: chelovek I kul’tura: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (St. Peterburg 12 dekabria 2023). — St. Peterburg: RHGA Publ. — S. 78–84. — (In Russian)
8. Floridi L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. — Oxford: Oxford University Press. — 410 s. — (In English)
9. Parsons T. (1949). The structure of social action. — Glencoe Illinois: The free press. — 815 s. — (In English).