<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="ru">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RCHA-Review</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Вестник Русской христианской гуманитарной академии</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
          <trans-title>RCAH Review</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25991/VRHGA.2025.2.2.006</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Аналитическая философия на российской сцене и феноменология</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
          <trans-title>ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY ON THE RUSSIAN STAGE AND PHENOMENOLOGY</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name-alternatives>
            <name>
              <surname>Колесников</surname>
              <given-names>Анатолий Сергеевич</given-names>
            </name>
            <name xml:lang="en">
              <surname>Kolesnikov</surname>
              <given-names>Anatolii Sergeevich</given-names>
            </name>
          </name-alternatives>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1-en"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1" xml:lang="ru">Русская христианская гуманитарная академия им. Ф. М. Достоевского</aff>
      <aff id="aff1-en" xml:lang="en">The Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after Fyodor Dostoevsky</aff>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>19</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>75</fpage>
      <lpage>90</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2025 Русская христианская гуманитарная академия</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Русская христианская гуманитарная академия</copyright-holder>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://rhga.ru/izdaniya/vestnik-rhga/arhiv/statia.php?ID=11402">https://rhga.ru/izdaniya/vestnik-rhga/arhiv/statia.php?ID=11402</self-uri>
      <abstract xml:lang="ru">
        <p>Статья анализирует взаимосвязь и взаимовлияние аналитической философии и феноменологии. Так, демонстрируются некоторые общие черты интересов и доктрин ранней аналитической философии и феноменологии, которые становятся более известными, как и исторические связи между такими философами, как Рассел, Мур, Брентано и Мейнонг, Фреге и Гуссерль, Райль и Хайдеггер. Имеются исторические и методологические связи, которые отчасти представлены в статье. История «расхождения» путей аналитиков и феноменологов представлена отчасти, с особым акцентом на творчество Гильберта Райля. Сыграли свою роль и доктринальные различия школ аналитической философии и феноменологии., но объединяющим фактором выступают при этом осознание степени, в которой мир может быть понят или познан посредством исследования человеческого опыта, мысли или языка.</p>
      </abstract>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>The article analyzes the relationship and mutual influence of analytical philosophy and phenomenology. Thus, some common features of the interests and doctrines of early analytical philosophy and phenomenology are demonstrated, which are becoming better known, as well as historical connections between such philosophers as Russell, Moore, Brentano and Meinong, Frege and Husserl, Ryle and Heidegger. There are historical and methodological connections, which are partly presented in the article. The history of the “divergence” of the paths of analysts and phenomenologists is presented in part, with a special emphasis on the work of Gilbert Ryle. Doctrinal differences between the schools of analytical philosophy and phenomenology also played a role, but the unifying factor is the awareness of the extent to which the world can be understood or cognized through the study of human experience, thought or language.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>Рассел</kwd>
        <kwd>Гуссерль</kwd>
        <kwd>Райль</kwd>
        <kwd>аналитическая философия</kwd>
        <kwd>феноменология</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Russell</kwd>
        <kwd>Husserl</kwd>
        <kwd>Ryle</kwd>
        <kwd>analytical philosophy</kwd>
        <kwd>phenomenology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 24–28–00295, https://rscf.ru/project/24–28–00295/; Русская христианская гуманитарная академия им. Ф. М. Достоевского.</funding-statement>
        <funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 24–28–00295, https://rscf.ru/project/24–28–00295/; The Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after Fyodor Dostoevsky, 15, Fontanka Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation.</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">1. Alexander S. II: Collective Willing and Truth. In: Mind, 1913, 22, pр. 14–47.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Alexander S. II: Collective Willing and Truth. In: Mind, 1913, 22, pр. 14–47.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2. Austin J. L. A Plea for Excuses. In: Philosophical Papers. Eds. J. Urmson. and G. Warnock. Oxford: OUP, 1961.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Austin J. L. A Plea for Excuses. In: Philosophical Papers. Eds. J. Urmson. and G. Warnock. Oxford: OUP, 1961.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">3. Bosanquet B. Review of Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänomenologische Forschung. In: Mind,1914, 23, pр. 587–597.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Bosanquet B. Review of Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänomenologische Forschung. In: Mind,1914, 23, pр. 587–597.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">4. Brentano F. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, L. L. McAlister. London: Routledge, 1995.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Brentano F. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, L. L. McAlister. London: Routledge, 1995.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">5. Briggs A., Alan I., E. Martin, eds. Who’s who in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Briggs A., Alan I., E. Martin, eds. Who’s who in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">6. Chase J., Reynolds J. Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on The Methods and Value of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2011.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Chase J., Reynolds J. Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on The Methods and Value of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2011.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">7. Dummett M. Origins of Analytical Philosophy, London: Duckworth,1993.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Dummett M. Origins of Analytical Philosophy, London: Duckworth,1993.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">8. Durfee Harold A., ed. Analytic philosophy and phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Durfee Harold A., ed. Analytic philosophy and phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">9. Hicks G. D. The Philosophy of Husserl. In: Hibbert Journal, 1913–14, 13, pр. 198–202.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Hicks G. D. The Philosophy of Husserl. In: Hibbert Journal, 1913–14, 13, pр. 198–202.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10. Honderich T., ed. Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Honderich T., ed. Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">11. Huemer W. The Constitution of Consciousness: A Study in Analytic Phenomenology. London: Routledge, 2005.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Huemer W. The Constitution of Consciousness: A Study in Analytic Phenomenology. London: Routledge, 2005.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">12. Kusch M. Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1995.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Kusch M. Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1995.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">13. Marcel G. Tragic Wisdom and Beyond, Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Marcel G. Tragic Wisdom and Beyond, Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">14. Mays Wolfe, and S. C. Brown, eds. Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1969.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Mays Wolfe, and S. C. Brown, eds. Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1969.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">15. Mohanty J. N. “Reply to Sellars”. R. Bruzina, eds. In: Crosscurrents in Phenomenology, 1978, vol. 7, pр. 186–198.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Mohanty J. N. “Reply to Sellars”. R. Bruzina, eds. In: Crosscurrents in Phenomenology, 1978, vol. 7, pр. 186–198.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">16. Mohanty J. N. Husserl and Frege. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1982.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Mohanty J. N. Husserl and Frege. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1982.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">17. Monk R. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude. London: Jonathan Cape, 1996.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Monk R. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude. London: Jonathan Cape, 1996.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">18. Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge, 2000.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge, 2000.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">19. Mulligan K., Simons P., Smith B. What is wrong with contemporary philosophy? In: Topoi, 2006, vol. 25, pр. 63–67.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Mulligan K., Simons P., Smith B. What is wrong with contemporary philosophy? In: Topoi, 2006, vol. 25, pр. 63–67.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">20. Overgaard S. Revisiting Royaumont. In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2010, 18:5, pр. 899–924.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Overgaard S. Revisiting Royaumont. In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2010, 18:5, pр. 899–924.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">21. Preston A. Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion. London: Continuum, 2007.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Preston A. Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion. London: Continuum, 2007.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">22. Royce Josiah. The World and the Individual In: International Journal of Ethics, 1902, 12 (3), pр. 389–398.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Royce Josiah. The World and the Individual In: International Journal of Ethics, 1902, 12 (3), pр. 389–398.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">23. Russell B. Letter to G. F. Stout, 10 June 1918, #119573, Box 6.27, Bertrand Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/119573.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23. Russell B. Letter to G. F. Stout, 10 June 1918, #119573, Box 6.27, Bertrand Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/119573.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">24. Russell B. Letter to E. Husserl, 19 April 1920, #95393, Box 5.47, Bertrand Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/95393.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24. Russell B. Letter to E. Husserl, 19 April 1920, #95393, Box 5.47, Bertrand Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/95393.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">24. Russell B. The Analysis of Mind. London: Allen and Unwin, 1921.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24. Russell B. The Analysis of Mind. London: Allen and Unwin, 1921.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">25. Russell B. Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, Sceptical Essays. London: Norton, 1928.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">25. Russell B. Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, Sceptical Essays. London: Norton, 1928.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">26. Russell B. Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, Collected Papers volume 7, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">26. Russell B. Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, Collected Papers volume 7, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">27. Russell E. Letter to F. Gusberti- Cazzani, 26 June 1961, #24183, Box 6.08, Bertrand Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/24183.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">27. Russell E. Letter to F. Gusberti- Cazzani, 26 June 1961, #24183, Box 6.08, Bertrand Russell Archives, McMaster University, http://bracers.mcmaster.ca/24183.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">28. Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949/2009.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">28. Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949/2009.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">29. Ryle G. Dilemmas. Cambridge: CUP, 1952.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">29. Ryle G. Dilemmas. Cambridge: CUP, 1952.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">30. Ryle G. Autobiographical. In: Wood, Oscar P., and George Pitcher, eds. Ryle. New York: Doubleday and Co Wood and Pitcher, 1970.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">30. Ryle G. Autobiographical. In: Wood, Oscar P., and George Pitcher, eds. Ryle. New York: Doubleday and Co Wood and Pitcher, 1970.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">31. Ryle G. Critical Essays: Collected Papers Volume 1. London: Routledge, 1971/2009.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">31. Ryle G. Critical Essays: Collected Papers Volume 1. London: Routledge, 1971/2009.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">32. Ryle G. Collected papers volume 2: Collected essays. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">32. Ryle G. Collected papers volume 2: Collected essays. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">33. Ryle G. Review of Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zum, 1927.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">33. Ryle G. Review of Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zum, 1927.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">34. Problem des Wesens, by Roman Ingarden. In: Mind 36, no. 143, рp. 366–70.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">34. Problem des Wesens, by Roman Ingarden. In: Mind 36, no. 143, рp. 366–70.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">35 .Schmid A.-F. ed. Bertrand Russell: Correspondance sur la philosophie, la logique et la politique avec Louis Couturat (1897–1913). Paris: Éditions Kimé, 2001. #82/</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">35 .Schmid A.-F. ed. Bertrand Russell: Correspondance sur la philosophie, la logique et la politique avec Louis Couturat (1897–1913). Paris: Éditions Kimé, 2001. #82/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">36. Sellars W. “Some Reflections on Perceptual Consciousness”. In: Ronald Bruzina and Bruce Wilshire (eds), Crosscurrents in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1978, pр. 169–85.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">36. Sellars W. “Some Reflections on Perceptual Consciousness”. In: Ronald Bruzina and Bruce Wilshire (eds), Crosscurrents in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1978, pр. 169–85.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">37. Simons P. Philosophy and logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1992.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">37. Simons P. Philosophy and logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1992.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">38. Smith J. The Russell- Meinong Debate. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1985, vol. 45, рp. 305–350.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">38. Smith J. The Russell- Meinong Debate. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1985, vol. 45, рp. 305–350.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">39. Spiegelberg H. The Context of the Phenomenological Movement, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1981.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">39. Spiegelberg H. The Context of the Phenomenological Movement, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1981.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">40. Stroll A. 2000. Twentieth- century analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">40. Stroll A. 2000. Twentieth- century analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">41. Thomasson A. Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy. In: Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2002, vol. XL, pр. 115–33.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">41. Thomasson A. Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy. In: Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2002, vol. XL, pр. 115–33.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">42. Tugendhat E. Description as the method of philosophy in Mays, Wolfe, and S. C. Brown, eds. 1969. Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1969, pр. 256–66.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">42. Tugendhat E. Description as the method of philosophy in Mays, Wolfe, and S. C. Brown, eds. 1969. Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1969, pр. 256–66.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref44">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">43. Urmson J. Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Wars, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956/1967.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">43. Urmson J. Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Wars, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956/1967.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref45">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">44. Warnock G. L. English Philosophy since 1900. Second Edition, Greenwood Press, 1982.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">44. Warnock G. L. English Philosophy since 1900. Second Edition, Greenwood Press, 1982.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref46">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">45. Warnock M. A Memoir: People and Places. London: Duckworth, 2002.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">45. Warnock M. A Memoir: People and Places. London: Duckworth, 2002.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref47">
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">46. Wittgenstein L. Culture and Value, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.</mixed-citation>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">46. Wittgenstein L. Culture and Value, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>