Interpretation of the common good in the «new» integralism and its politico-legal consequences

Annotation

In this articles the view of key representatives of the “new” integralism movement are being analyzed through the prism of the concept of the common good. It is stated that the authors in question tend to partially deconstruct previous Catholic tradition and to choose only those elements of interpretation of the common good that allow them to legitimize their own politico-legal views. The article also introduces the classification of ideological current inside the movement itself based on two criteria — position on the institute of the modern state and desired level of integration between spiritual and earthly powers. In the concluding part the views of authors in question are compared to those of the medieval thinkers <br> also to the modern activists from the left, whose methods of political struggle are copied by the “new” integralists. 

Keywords

catholicism, integralism, common good, postliberalism, conservatism.

Literature

1. Компендиум социального учения Церкви. — М.: Паолине, 2006. — 628 с.
2. Фома Аквинский. Сумма Теологии. Часть II–I. Вопросы 1–48. — Киев: Эльга,
Ника-Центр, 2006. — 576 с.
3. Фома Аквинский. Сумма Теологии. Часть II–I. Вопросы 90–114. — Киев: Эльга, Ника-Центр, 2010. — 432 с.
4. Barnett R. Deep-State Constitutionalism // Claremont Review of Books. URL: https:// claremontreviewofbooks.com/deep-state-constitutionalism/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022). 5. Bersnack P. The Political Common Good according to St. Thomas Aquinas and John Finnis. PhD diss. — The Catholic University of America, the Faculty of the Department of
Politics School of Arts and Sciences, Washington, 2014. — 202 p.
6. Boyd B. «Trotsky and St. Benedict» — and Pope Francis // The Irish Rover. — URL:
https://irishrover.net/2017/04/trotsky-and-st-benedict-and-pope-francis/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
7. Canning J. Ecclesiastical Authority and Jurisdiction in the Thought of John of Paris // John of Paris. Beyond Royal and Papal Power. / Ed. by Chris Jones. — Turnhout: Brepols Publishers n. v., 2015. — P. 35–48.
8. Crean T., Fimister A. Integralism: A Manual of Political Philosophy. — EDITIONES SCHOLASTICAE, 2020. — 290 p.
9. Diaz T., Aquilla J. Andrew W. Jones, Before Church and State: A Study of Social Order in the Sacramental Kingdom of St. Louis IX // Catholic Social Science Review. — 2021. — Vol. 26. — P. 296–298.
10. Hittinger R. The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World. — Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2007. — XLVI. + 334 p.
11. Integralism in Three Sentences // The Josias. — URLhttp://thejosias.com/2016/10/17/ integralism-in-three-sentences/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
12. Jones A. W. Before Church and State: A Study of Social Order in the Sacramental Kingdom of St. Louis IX. — Steubenville, Ohio: Emmaus Academic, 2017. — 510 p.
13. Jones A. W. The Priority of Peace and the Problem of Power // New Polity. — URL: https://newpolity.com/blog/the-priority-of-peace-and-the-problem-of-power (дата обраще- ния: 01.08.2022).
14. Kirk R. What is Conservatism? // The essential Russell Kirk: Selected Essays. / Ed. by G. A. Panichas. — Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2007. — P. 4–23.
15. Koninck de C. The Primacy of the Common Good against the Personalists // The writings of Charles De Koninck / Ed. and transl. by Ralph McInerny. — Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009. — P. 63–108.
16. Kozinski T. Alasdair MacIntyre: From Socratic Subverter to Supporter of the State // The Imaginative Conservative. — 2016. — URL: https://theimaginativeconservative. org/2016/04/alasdair-macintyre-socratic-subverter-supporter-state-thaddeus-kozinski.html (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
17. Krogt van der C. Catholic Fundamentalism or Catholic Integralism? // To Strive and Not to Yield: Essays in Honour of Colin Brown. / Ed. by Veatch J. — Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, 1992. — P. 123–135.
18. MacIntyre A. Natural Law as Subversive: The Case of Aquinas // Ethics and politics. — Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. — P. 41–63.
19. McAleer G. A Wokeness for Rad Trads. — URL: https://lawliberty.org/book-review/a- wokeness-for-rad-trads/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
20. McAleer G. Giles of Rome on Political Authority // Journal of the History of Ideas. — Jan., 1999. — Vol. 60. — No. 1. — P. 21–36.
21. Menard X. F., Su A. Liberalism, Catholic Integralism, and the Question of Religious Freedom // BYU Law Review. — 2022. — Vol. 47. — Iss. 4. — P. 1171–1219.
22. Pink T. What is the Catholic doctrine of religious liberty? — URL: https://www. academia.edu/639061/What_is_the_Catholic_doctrine_of_religious_liberty (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
23. Posner E., Vermeule A. The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. — 249 p.
24. Rose M. A World after Liberalism: Philosophers of the Radical Right. — New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2021. — 208 p.
25. Schragger R., Schwartzman M. Religious Antiliberalism and the First Amendment // Minnesota Law Review. — 2019. — Vol. 104. — P. 1341–1428.
26. Schragger R., Schwartzman M. What Common Good? — URL: https://prospect.org/ culture/books/what-common-good-vermeule-review/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
27. Smith G. About Three-in-Ten U. S. Adults Are Now Religiously Unaffiliated // Pew Research Center. — 2021. — URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/12/14/about- three-in-ten-u-s-adults-are-now-religiously-unaffiliated/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
28. Takayama H. The local administrative system of France under Philip IV (1285–1314) — baillis and seneschals // Journal of Medieval History. — June 1995. — Vol. 21. — Iss. 2. — June 1995. — P. 167–193.
29. Vermeule A. Common Good Constitutionalism. — Polity Books: 2022. — 270 p.
30. Vermeule A. How to Read Dobbs. — URL: https://iusetiustitium.com/how-to-read- dobbs/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
31. Waldstein E. An Integralist Manifesto. — URL: https://www.firstthings.com/ article/2017/10/an-integralist-manifesto (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
32. Waldstein E. Integralism and Gelasian Dyarchy. — URL: https://thejosias. com/2016/03/03/integralism-and-gelasian-dyarchy/ (дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
33. Wyllie R. Reconsidering Tyranny and Tyrannicide in Aquinas’s De Regno // Perspectives on Political Science. — 2018. — Vol. 47. — Iss. 3. — 2018. — P. 154–160.