Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2023, Volume 24, Issue 2
From the history of the «nomenclature» historiography of Russian philosophy

From the history of the «nomenclature» historiography of Russian philosophy

2023
Volume №24
Issue 2
Section: Русская философия
Ermichev Aleksandr Aleksandrovich
Организатор и руководитель семинара «Русская мысль»
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.2.2.008
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

The article is a commentary on the publication in the USSR in the 50s of the last century of classical works on the history of Russian philosophy, belonging to two philosophers of the Russian diaspora — N. O. Lossky and V. V. Zenkovsky. Russian Russian historians consider the appearance of their works as one of the episodes of the slow departure of Soviet historians of Russian philosophy from the pattern of its consideration imposed in the 40–50s of the twentieth century by their colleagues to the Soviet society by a number of historians of Russian philosophy who held various posts in the party and scientific and educational structures of the USSR. The concept of «nomenclature historiography» of Russian philosophy is constructed and its representatives are named. The article points to the ideological task assumed by the publication of these books, the proof of which is the special way of using these publications in the literature departments of the special storage of public libraries. The content of the nomenclature template is considered when covering the history of Russian philosophy, when the latter appears as the formation of materialism, which resulted in the victorious perception of Marxism in Russia and the emergence of Leninism as the highest stage of the development of world culture. Russian «nomenclature» criticism of the books of N. O. Lossky and V. V. Zenkovsky and their responses to such criticism is analyzed. The appendix to this article is the publication of prefaces to the editions of the «History of Russian Philosophy» by N. O. Lossky (1954) and V. V. Zenkovsky (1956).

Keywords

history of Russian philosophy, materialism, idealism, Leninism, progress, revolution, N. O. Lossky, V. V. Zenkovsky, literature of special storage.

Literature

1. Alekseev P. V. Philosophers of Russia of the XIX–XX centuries. Biographies, ideas, works / 4th ed. reprint. and add. — M.: Academic project. 2002.
2. Varlamova S. F. Special Reserve of the Russian National Library: past and present // Library Science. Russian Russian Academy of Sciences, 1993, No. 2, pp. 74-82. 3. Yemelyanov B. V. Historiography of Russian Philosophy // Russkaya filosofiya. Encyclopedia / 4th ed., dorab. and add. Under the general editorship of M. A. Maslin. Moscow: Algorithm, 2022. pp. 293-296. 4. Zelenov M. V. Apparatus of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party(b) — VKP(b), censorship and historical science in the 1920s. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. 5. Zenkovsky V. V. Who is falsifying the history of Russian philosophy? / Russian Russian Way / Zenkovskiy V. V. Collected Works: in 2 volumes - vol. 1. On Russian Philosophy and Literature. Moscow: Russkiy put. 2008. pp. 208-213.
6. Krugkov V. S., Fedoseev P. M. The main features of Russian classical philosophy of the 19th century // Bolshevik. — 1993. — No. 6. — pp. 22-34.
7. Kuvakin V. A., Maslin M. A. Preface // Lossky N. O. Istothe Theory of Russian Philosophy. Moscow: Higher School, 1991. pp. 3-18. 8. Lossky N. O. Response to Soviet critics of the "History of Russian Philosophy" // Grani. — 1956. — No. 30. — pp. 175-181.
9. Malinin A.V., Tarakanov N. G., Shchipanov I. Ya. Against modern bourgeois falsifiers of the history of Russian philosophy // Communist. — 1955. — No. 10, July. — pp. 61-76.
Russian Russian Academy of Sciences 10. Maslov K. S. "Sent according to a special list": about the publications of the "History of Russian Philosophy by N. O. Lossky and V. V. Zenkovsky in the USSR in the 50s of the twentieth century. // Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. — 2015. — Vol. 16. Issue 4. — pp. 408-411.
11. Sadovsky V. N. Philosophy in Moscow in the 50s and 60s // Philosophy does not end... From the history of Russian philosophy. The twentieth century: in 2 books. — Book 2: 1960-1980s. — M.: ROSSPAN, 1998.
12. Tarakanov N. G. Falsifiers of the history of Russian philosophical thought // First of all, philosophy. — 1955. — No. 3. — pp. 73-85.
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия