A mortal animal, an immortal man. The teaching of John Philoponus on the animal soul in the 5th and 6th books of the treatise «De opificio mundi»
Annotation
This article is devoted to the teachings of the neoplatonic philosopher and theologian of the 6th century. John Philoponus on the mortality of the animal soul in his late exegetical treatise «On the Creation of the World». Several passages from the Fifth and sixth books of the treatise are analyzed in comparison with the earlier commentary by John Philopon on Aristotle’s treatise «De opificio mundi». It is shown that the concept of «homonymy by action» plays a key role in the doctrine of the soul of the Alexandrian thinker, the consistent disclosure of which allows John Philoponus to describe various levels of the noncorporeal — the Holy Spirit, the rational soul, the animal soul — as realities having completely different principles of existence. That is why the immortality of the rational soul in the mode of being autonomous from the body and the mortality of the animal soul are an expression of the ontological gap between these types of soul in the anthropology of John Philoponus.
Keywords
John Philoponus, anthropology, animals, immortality of the soul, rational soul, mind, animal soul, Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias.
Literature
1. Aristotle. About the soul / V. K. Serezhnikova, translated and translated by P. S. Popov, Moscow: State Socio-Economic Publishing House, 1937.
2. Baranov V. V. The animation of the body in the treatise "On the Creation of the World" by John Philopon // Byzantium, Europe, Russia: social practices and interrelation of spiritual traditions. The archive of the conference. Issue 2: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (St. Petersburg, September 22-24, 2022) / ed. by O. N. Nogovitsin; FNSC RAS. — St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022. — pp. 341-362.
3. Varlamova M. N. Alexander of Aphrodisia on the soul as the cause of its appearance // ΣΧΟΛΗ. 2021b. - Vol. 15. — No. 1. — pp. 289-306.
4. Varlamova M. N. How the soul moves the body: the nature of pneuma as an instrumental cause in Philopon's teaching about the soul // σΧTHEY ARE A PART OF THE FAMILY. — 2022. — Vol. 16. — No. 2. — pp. 674-692. 5. Varlamova M. N. Animating the embryo in the commentary by John Philopon
on "The Soul" by Aristotle // Platonic studies. — 2020. — Vol. 13. — No. 2. — pp. 157-173.
6. Varlamova M. N. The problem of defining the soul as the beginning of movement in Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisia // Historical and Philosophical Yearbook. — 2021a. — No. 36. — pp. 162-195.
* For information on how this concept works in John Philopon's teaching on the resurrection, see [20; 7].
208
7. Lurie V. M. The identity of the human personality according to John Philopon: the physical body in space and the human body after resurrection // ESSE: Philosophical and Theological Studies. — 2016. — Vol. 1. — No. 2. — pp. 388-420.
8. Chernoglazov D. A. "Homonyms", "synonyms" and "paronyms" in late Antique logic and grammatical theory // ΣΧΟΛΗ. — Vol. 16. — No. 1. — pp. 191-217.
9. Accattino P. Alejandro de Afrodisia intérprete del De anima de Aristóteles // Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia). — 2009. — Vol. 40. — P. 53–77.
10. Ammonius in Aristotelis categorias commentarius (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 4.4) / ed. A. Busse. — Berlin: Reimer, 1895.
11. Benevich G. John Philoponus and Maximus the Confessor at the Crossroads of Philosophical and Theological Thought in Late Antiquity // Scrinium: Revue de patrologie, d’hagiographie critique et d’histoire ecclésiastique. Ars Christiana: In Memoriam Michail F. Murianov (21.XI.1928–6.VI.1995). — 2011. — Vol. 7. — No 1. — P. 102–130.
12. Boeri M. D. Alejandro de Afrodisia como intérprete de la noética aristotélica // Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia). — 2009. — Vol. 40. — P. 79–107.
13. Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis de anima libros commentaria (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 15) / ed. M. Hayduck. — Berlin: Reimer, 1897.
14. Johannes Philoponos. De opificio mundi. Über die Erschaffung der Welt. Bd. 1–3 / hg. C. Scholten. — Freiburg; Basel; Wien; Barcelona; Rom; New York: Herder, 1997.
15. Krausmüller D. When Christology Intersects with Embryology: The Viewpoints of Nestorian, Monophysite and Chalcedonian Authors of the Sixth to Tenth Centuries // Byzantinische Zeitschrift. — 2020. — Bd. 113. — No 3. — P. 853–878.
16. Mittelmann J. Neoplatonic Sailors and Peripatetic Ships: Aristotle, Alexander and Philoponus // Journal of the History of Philosophy. — 2013. — Vol. 51. — No 4. — P. 545–566. 17. Moraux P. Alexandre d’Aphrodise Exégète de la Noétique D’Aristote. — Liège: Faculté
de Philosophie Et Lettres E. Droz, 1942.
18. Philoponi (olim Ammonii) in Aristotelis categorias commentarium (Commentaria
in Aristotelem Graeca 13.1) / ed. A. Busse. — Berlin: Reimer, 1898.
19. Scholten C. Welche Seele hat der Embryo? Johannes Philoponus und die Antike
Embryologie // Vigiliae Christianae. — 2005. — Vol. 59. — S. 377–411.
20. Schrenk L. P. John Philoponus on the Immortal Soul // The American Catholic
Philosophical Association Proceedings. — 1990. — Vol. 64. — P. 151–160.
The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research in the framework of the scientific
Project No. 20-011-41004 "John Philoponus' Treatise on the Creation of the World" in the context of
Middle Eastern Syro-Palestinian and Byzantine Theological (Christological,
anthropological, cosmological) traditions"