Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2025, Volume 26, Issue 4
Family axiology: between tradition and archaic

Family axiology: between tradition and archaic

2025
Volume №26
Issue 4
Publication date: 14.12.2025
Section: Культурология
Priluckij Aleksandr Mihajlovich
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2025.4.4.056
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

In this article, the author explores issues related to the concept of traditional family values in the context of changes occurring both in society as a whole and in the religious culture of everyday life. The meanings of terms describing family values and their specificity are discussed, the terms “tradition” and “archaic” are analyzed with an emphasis on distortions occurring at the level of public consciousness and terminology. The author emphasizes that the term “tradition” should not be identified with “habit” and emphasizes that traditional values form moral guidelines and ideals underlying family relationships. An approach to understanding values through the prism of psychological specification and socio- cultural preferences is proposed. The author emphasizes that various parareligious marginal communities that claim to restore traditional morality actually form a cultural space of archaism. The problem of divorce is critically examined and the idea of the indissolubility of marriage is analyzed in the context of modern realities and church teaching. In conclusion, the work substantiates the need to take into account the cultural and historical context when developing approaches to strengthening traditional moral norms in modern society

Keywords

traditional values, family values, marriage, divorce, symbolic structures.

Literature

1. Bogatiryov [Burlaka], D. K. Myshlenie i Otkrovenie [Thinking and Revelation]. Saint
Petersburg, RHGA, Publ., 2007. 448 p. (in Russian).
2. Bogatiryov [Burlaka], D. K. Poniatie kul’tury v kontekste idei russkoi religioznoi
filosofii [Concept of culture in the context of the russian religious philosophy]. In: Izvestiia
RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2008, no. 50, pр. 7–19 (in Russian).
3. Golovushkin, D. A. Religioznyi fundamentalizm / religioznyi modernizm:
kontseptual’nye protivniki ili ambivalentnye fenomeny? [religious fundamentalism/religious
modernism: conceptual adversaries or ambivalent phenomena?]. In: Vestnik Pravoslavnogo
Sviato- Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia, 2015, no.
1(57), pр. 87–97 (in Russian).
4. Golovushkin, D. A. Religioznoe obnovlenie sovremennosti [Religious renovation
of modernity]. In: Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Politologiya.
Religiovedenie, 2015, vol. 11, pр. 202–210 (in Russian).
5. Eshche odin moshchneishii udar ekumenistov po russkoi tserkvi… Sinod RPTs izmenil
pravila kreshcheniia i pominoveniia [Another powerful blow from ecumenists to the Russian
Church… The Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church changed the rules of baptism and
commemoration.] URL: https://3rm.info/main/78386-esche-odin-udar-jekumenistov-porusskoj- cerkvi-sinod-rpc-izmenil- pravila-kreschenija-i-pominovenija.html#sel=7:1,8:7
(accessed: 25.05.2025) (in Russian).
6. Kostiuk, K. N. Arkhaika i modernizm v rossiiskoi kul’ture [Archaic and modernism
in Russian culture]. In: Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 1999, no. 3–4, pр. 5–19 (in Russian).
7. Lavrinova, N. N., Chebotarev, S. A, Kozhevnikova, T. M. Sotsial’nye funktsii dukhovnonravstvennykh traditsii v kul’ture [Social functions of spiritual and moral traditions in culture].
In: Neofilologiia, 2022, no. 29, pр. 179–191 (in Russian).
8. Lavrov, V. M. Pravoslavnaia sem’ia v predrevoliutsionnoi Rossii (po publitsistike vtoroi
poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka) [The Orthodox family in pre-revolutionary Russia (based
on journalism from the second half of the 19th — early 20th centuries)]. Moscow, Lana Publ.,
2018. 288 p. (in Russian).
9. Lebedev, V. Iu., Prilutskii, A. M. Tipologiia traditsii v kontekste profilaktiki
ekstremistskogo povedeniia: germenevticheskie aspekty. [Prevention of extremism in the
education system]. In: Profilaktika ekstremizma v sisteme obrazovaniia, Moskow, MPGU Publ.,
2021, no. 1, pр. 40–48 (in Russian).
10. Limont’ev, P. S. Sovremennaia teoriia uspekha i mental’nyi reliativizm zhiznennogo
proekta [Modern Theory of Success and Mental Relativism of the Life Project]. In: Iuzhnorossiiskii zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk, 2008, no. 1, pр. 77–85 (in Russian).
11. Lopin, R. A. Traditsionnye semeinye tsennosti kak formula liubvi k otechestvu
[Traditional family values as a formula of love for the fatherland]. In: Trudy Belgorodskoi
dukhovnoi seminarii, 2020, no. 10, pр. 68–74 (in Russian).
12. Lotova, I. P. Sistemnyi podkhod k izucheniiu semeinykh tsennostei v sovremennom
rossiiskom obshchestve [A systematic approach to the study of family values in the modern
russian society]. In: Statistika i ekonomika, 2015, no. 5, pр. 62–66 (in Russian).
13. Meiendorf Ioann, Protoierei. Brak v pravoslavii [Marriage in Orthodoxy]. [Electronic
resource] URL: https://predanie.ru/book/71988-brak-v-pravoslavii/ (accessed:: 25.05.2025)
(in Russian).
14. Nikodim (Milash), Sviashchennoispovednik. Pravila Sviatykh Ottsov Pravoslavnoi
Tserkvi s tolkovaniiami [Rules of the Holy Fathers of the Orthodox Church with interpretations].
[Electronic resource] URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Nikodim_Milash/pravila- svjatyh-ottsovpravoslavnoj-tserkvi-s-tolkovanijami/10 (accessed:: 25.05.2025) (in Russian).
15. On Christian marriage, preserving the family and grounds for divorce. Moscow, Spasskoe
Delo Publishing House, 2018. 344 p. (in Russian).
16. Ostanina, N. A., Mosunova, K. A. Sem’evedenie. Moia sem’ia: 5–7 klassy. Uchebnoe
posobie [Family Studies. My Family: 5–7 grades. Study guide.] Moskow, Prosveshchenie, 2025.
159 p. (in Russian).
17. Ostanina, N. A., Mosunova, K. A. Sem’evedenie. Moia sem’ia: 8–9 klassy. Uchebnoe
posobie [Family Studies. My Family: 8–9 grades. Study guide]. Moskow, Prosveshchenie, 2025.
159 p. (in Russian).
18. Silant’ev, R., Ragozin, Iu. Parapravoslavnye sekty sovremennoi Rossii [Para- Orthodox
sects of modern Russia]. Moskow, Snezhnyi Kom M., 2021, 432 p. (in Russian).
19. Sluzhba Dukhovnoi Bezopasnosti [Spiritual Security Service]. [Electronic resource]
URL: https://www.youtube.com/@sdb77 (accessed:: 25.05.2025) (in Russian)
20. Sokolovskii, L. O postepennom razvitii idei braka v Drevnem mire [On the gradual
development of the idea of marriage in the ancient world] Moskow, Librokom, 2013. 152 p.
(in Russian).
21. Troshkina, I. N. Semeinye tsennosti: kategoriia, struktura [Family values: category
and structure]. In: Filosofskaia mysl’, 2022, no. 12, pр. 1–8 (in Russian).
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия