Диссертационный совет
Back
Психологические исследования
Back
Вестник РХГА. Филологические науки
Back
Фотогалерея
Back
Menu
Абитуриентам
Back
Applicant's personal account
Programs for admission
Educations costs
Tuition benefits
Open days
FAQ
Dormitory
For applicants and parents
Applicants lists and orders for enrollment
Колледж
Back
About college
College news
Education programs
LMS
Студентам
Back
LMS
Learning calendars for academic year
Tuition fees
Military registration
Library
Social support measures for students
Academic center for psychological assistance
Career center
Аспирантам
Back
Final certification
Library
LMS
Military registration
Scientific specialties in RCAH
Learning calendars for academic year
Candidate's exams
Individual postgraduate work plan
Преподавателям
Back
Assistance to teachers
Using LMS and distance learning technologies
Academic Council
Contests and election documents
Conference of employees and students
Оплата обучения
Back
Bank requisites
Воинский учёт
Back
Military registration memo
Deferment from conscription
Conscript legislation
Citizens responsibility on not fulfilling duties for military registration
Библиотека
Back
Terms of use
Publications
RCAH Review
Archive
RCAH Review, 2023, Volume 24, Issue 1
Metaphysics of beauty in christian neoplatonism of Nicholas of Cusa

Metaphysics of beauty in christian neoplatonism of Nicholas of Cusa

2023
Volume №24
Issue 1
Section: Философия
Fedchuk Dmitrii Arkadevich
Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of Culture, Institute of Human Philosophy, Herzen State Pedagogical University of the Russian Federation; Associate Professor, Department of Jewish Culture, Institute of Philosophy, St. Petersburg State University
DOI:
10.25991/VRHGA.2023.1.1.007
Download article file
Download article metadata file

Annotation

From Antiquity to the Middle Ages beauty was explained using the concepts of Platonic and Aristotelian metaphysics. The pleasure of a beautiful thing was reduced to the pleasure of contemplating the perfection of form but this contemplation was intellectual. Sensuality was excluded from the understanding of beauty and beauty itself was raised to the level of pure spirit and rational knowledge. Nicholas of Cusa relied on this tradition but to some extent changes the point of view. It would be possible to express completely aesthetic experience in the language of philosophy only in the XVIII century. In the thought of Nicholas of Cusa we are faced with the fact that philosophical reflection on the concept of beauty lags behind the development of art. Despite the fact that people have long understood the difference between beautiful and tasteless they were not yet able to expand their complete understanding in the language of philosophy. Philosophers remained in the context of traditional metaphysics because it was the first science. They have not yet realized that the nature of beauty is a sui generis nature that requires separate consideration. The obstacle to the aesthetic thought of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance was Aristotelian hylomorphism and the Neoplatonic understanding of causality in the finite being. As soon as these attitudes began to be abandoned, the path to the appearance of aesthetics would open.

Keywords

beauty, transcendental, metaphysics, unity, hylemorphism, Nicholas of Cusa, Meister Eckhart.

Literature

1. Meister Eckhart. Treatises. The sermons. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2010. 438 p.
2. Nicholas of Cusa. Essays in two volumes. — Vol. 1. — Moscow: Mysl, 1979. — 487 p.
3. Nikolai Kuzansky. Essays in two volumes. — Vol. 2. — Moscow: Mysl, 1980. — 470 p.
4. Eco U. Art and beauty in medieval aesthetics / Translated from it by A. Shurbeleva, Moscow: AST: CORPUS, 2015— 352 p.
5. Aesthetics of the Renaissance: An anthology: In 2 volumes — Vol. 1 / Comp. and scientific ed. by V. P. Shestakov. — M.: Iskusstvo Publ., 1981. 495 p.
6. Aertsen J. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals. The Case of Thomas Aquinas. — Leiden — New York — Köln: E. J. Brill, 1996.
7. Aertsen J. A. Medieval Philosophy as transcendental thought: from Phillip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Súarez. — Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2012.
8. Nicolaus Cusanus. Opera omnia // Cusanus-Portal. — URL: http://www.cusanus - portal.de / (date of access: 04.11.2022).
Социальные сети
ВКонтакте
Telegram
YouTube
Если Вы увидели на сайте неточность или ошибку - пожалуйста, напишите на электронную почту webmaster@rhga.ru
© Русская христианская гуманитарная академия